Obama’s done it again. He’s betrayed his progressive base—this time by announcing $8.3 billion in loan guarantees for two new nuclear power reactors in Georgia.

And he vows to keep on going down the dangerous path of nuclear power. “This is only the beginning,” he told us on Tuesday. “My budget proposes tripling the loan guarantees” for nuclear power plants.

Obama has always had the financial support of the nuclear power industry, so this shouldn’t be a shocker. But it is a slap in the face to environmentalists. And it comes at an odd time, since the Vermont Yankee plant has just been leaking radioactive tritium.

Obama waved at the safety issues surrounding nuclear power, as well as the waste disposal issue, but he’s plowing full steam ahead anyway. Though these will be the first nuclear reactors constructed in more than three decades, Obama still labeled them, somehow, as part of the “technologies of tomorrow.”

The design for Georgia plants themselves “have been rejected by the Nuclear Regulatory Commission as being unable to withstand natural cataclysms like hurricanes, tornadoes, and earthquakes,” writes Harvey Wasserman, one of the world’s leading anti-nuclear-power activists.

Obama claimed these plants would create a lot of jobs. But, as Wasserman points out, “energy experts at the Rocky Mountain Institute and elsewhere” have concluded that the same dollar spent on energy efficiency as on nuclear power could produce “ten times as many permanent jobs.”

As is his fashion, Obama justified his approval of the loan guarantees with his by-now hackneyed rhetoric about going beyond partisanship, or as he put it, “beyond the same old stale debates between the left and the right, between environmentalists and entrepreneurs.”

Such rhetoric has not served him well politically so far. And now it’s fronting for a potential disaster environmentally.

sooner or later, why not start now
FEBURARY 8*th 2010
why they killed King, puking down your throat & Haiti pity & profit
PREVIOUS AREAS   copyright 2001 2010 all rights reserved by respective sources & linked when available

radiation is not green
features  main  02.28.2010 & the girl next door 
Winter 2006


Anna's house
Matthew Rothschild is the editor of The Progressive magazine.
Facts about Solar Energy usage:

Solar Energy is measured in kilowatt-hour. 1 kilowatt = 1000 watts.

1 kilowatt-hour (kWh) = the amount of electricity required to burn a 100 watt light bulb for 10 hours.

According to the US Department of Energy, an average American household used approximately 866-kilowatt hours per month in 1999 costing them $70.68.

About 30% of our total energy consumption is used to heat water.
Facts about Solar Energy systems:
A home solar system is typically made up of solar panels, an inverter, a battery, a charge controller, wiring and support structure.

A 1-kilowatt home solar system takes about 1-2 days to install and costs around US$10,000, but can vary greatly and does not take into account any incentives offered by the government.

A 1-kilowatt home solar system consists of about 10-12 solar panels and requires about 100 square feet of installation area.

A 1 kilowatt home solar system will generate approximately 1,600 kilowatt hours per year in a sunny climate (receiving 5.5 hours of sunshine per day) and approximately 750 kilowatt hours per year in a cloudy climate (receiving 2.5 hours of sunshine per day).

A 1-kilowatt home solar system will prevent approximately 170 lbs. of coal from being burned, 300 lbs of CO2 from being released into the atmosphere and 105 gallons of water from being consumed each month!
Obama’s Hack Move on Nuclear Power
By Matthew Rothschild, February 17, 2010/span>
the art of the progressive
the most Dangerous man in America Daniel Ellsberg & Woody Harrleson
Jessi, Best of
Jessi, best of, coming
nuclear energy supplies less than 20% of US energy use, world wide, 2%
Monthly Feature, MILF calendar & Class War - tax war, Howard Zinn